MSNBC's Victoria Clayton has just published a new article titled, To cut or not?: Circumcision controversy flares. It is an interesting piece, if only because it presents two sides to the story-- those who are for circumcision, and the "intactivists" who are against it.
I wish this article could have been written 2 years ago! Joe and I both thought that circumcision was the easiest decision we had to make as new parents: Duh, of course, all boys are circumcised. Needless to say, Braeden is not "intact," though our next boy certainly will be. The poll included in the article reveals that the decision to cut or not is not as clear cut (no pun intended) as we had thought. The poll results are, surprisingly, almost equally divided.
Vote here!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment